I wonder how many times he was cited by the city for his building being and eyesore. It’s graffiti, we pay millions of dollars every Year to remove it, this guy years down the eyesore to build something better and this is what he gets, ridiculous
it's a stupid law, but why wouldn't he have follow it? seems pretty simple to give the folks time to come get their art. unless he was up against a strict time deadline for tearing it down or something.
Question... did the "artist" respect the owner and ask in writing for permission to destroy his proper? This @judge" needs to be dethroned and disbArred.
Now thats a crock of shit, what are these judges thinking today. Where in the hell did they all go to college at. Ignoramus U?
Wait it's okay to tag properties now but you don't have the right to tear down your own building? Please tell me this is a joke!
Find out where the judge lives and graffiti his house. Bet you’d find the idiot signing a complaint against you. Get him off the bench he is a waste of 02
So basically they vandalized HIS building, without his permission, he tore down HIS building and now he must pay the vandals because they were emotionally attached to their vandalism? Only in America....
What the is this garbage? Graffiti is a crime, you are vandalizing someone else's property. Apparently wolkoff shouldn't have allowed them to paint in the first place
I don't get how Judges think these days. Why is it that people who do the right thing are always the ones to pay the price? This is bullshit. So because he wasn't remorseful he needs to pay millions of dollars. Next time I hope he knows better then to let anyone to paint his buildings.
How in God's name did a law go into act that allows artist the right to pigeon hold someone else's property due to the art they wrongfully placed on it. I would take this to the Supreme Court because it is unlawful to pay this street trash a dime.